RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

The Reality of Tomorrow - a Fight for Survival
Consequences and Choices Post COVID-19
No Return to Yesterday Post COVID-19
The Condition of Democracy - Actions by Bad Actors
Time for Good Trouble, Necessary Trouble: Onward to Election Day, November 3

Most Popular Posts

Mourn with Moore
On Partnerships of Conflicting Ideologies as a Force Shaping Extremism
DC Linktank
The World in 2014 - Asia
From This Point


Elections 2013
Friends in Business
Gun control
Immigration Reform
In America
Natural Disaster
The World
Towards 2014


August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013

powered by

My Blog

"One Country, Two Systems" - the Carrie Lam Stress Variable in Hong Kong

The aspirations of the world's youth are the developmental building blocks of all societies. Even when such aspirations appear to contradict or to counter a governing authority, beneficial balances and compromises are usually formed with a view to maintaining the continuity of the structure that rules.

The ability to reach needed compromise and balance between government and its people defines a jurisdiction's government and its scope to effective authority and rule over the people. 

With that said: recent protests over a proposed extradition bill in Hong Kong, which China rules under a "one country, two systems" policy, should not be construed as any example of dissent of Chinese rule or against "one country, two systems", but  as an explicit opposition to the current local government in Hong Kong under its chief executive, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor. Lam, 62, was the Beijing supported candidate for chief executive, a post she has now held since 2017.

Returned to China by Great Britain in 1997, the past 22-years of Chinese rule in Hong Kong has not been without protests. Massive demonstrations for greater autonomy by Hong Kong's youth in 2014 triggered some reforms, yet the "one country, two systems" formula survived. But sadly, many pro-democracy activists were jailed and punished for their involvement in the Umbrella Movement. Until recently, the Umbrella Movement was the biggest of all protests in Hong Kong.

However, under Lam's leadership in Hong Kong, the numbers of protesters have swollen to over two million people turning out in the streets at one time of a population of seven million. The unprecedented number of demonstrators is indicative of the unpopularity of Lam and her execution of the job as chief executive of Hong Kong. 

Lam's claim yesterday that the protested extradition bill "is dead" in a last ditch effort to appease Hong Kong, will not likely satisfy protesters, who are demanding a full withdrawal of the legislation. Lam is damaged as a leader of Hong Kong. Her administration's imprisonment of Umbrella Movement demonstrators remains unpopular. Her government's disqualification of pro-democracy candidates in Hong Kong is also unpopular. Her raising of the age of threshold  for the Comprehensive Social Security Assistance welfare program has been very unpopular. Lam's responses to the current affairs of Hong Kong have often been taken to be somewhat condescending. And with her "total failure" to reconcile Hong Kong with the proposed extradition bill, Lam's continued leadership in Hong Kong must be at the pleasure of Beijing and not of the local people.

Therefore, it is not Hong Kong's protesters that offer any threat to the "one country, two systems" policy; that threat and danger rest with Carrie Lam and her local government. Hong Kong's government under Carrie Lam represents a very crucial stress variable to China's continuity of ruling Hong Kong under its "one country, two systems" policy.