RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

200,000 American COVID-19 Deaths - the Reality of the Scope of the Pandemic
A Health Guideline Reversal and Questions - the Diminishing Authority of Health Experts Amid COVID-19
75-Years-Later - Another Defining Time Before the United Nations
No Escape from Crossing Fate - Trump's Inescapable Responsibility for the Spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Humanity - Today's Dilemma and Events and the Choices Toward a United Peaceful Tomorrow

Most Popular Posts

Mourn with Moore
On Partnerships of Conflicting Ideologies as a Force Shaping Extremism
DC Linktank
The World in 2014 - Asia
From This Point


Elections 2013
Friends in Business
Gun control
Immigration Reform
In America
Natural Disaster
The World
Towards 2014


September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013

powered by

My Blog

Trade V. Freedom...the Ransom of Human Rights

If it is true that Great Britain is not pressuring China enough on democratic reforms in Hong Kong out of fear of damaging trade, then it is a bad practice and precedent that threatens British integrity to the ideals of freedom, equality and the rule of law. Furthermore, any such actions serve to underscore the hippocratic claims made by "want-to-be" Jihadists against the West to justify their fallible aims to join the ranks of the ISIL and other radical and extremist groups.

Human rights must always trump trade. The founding tenets of democracy and freedom are anchored in liberty, life and pursuit of happiness. To forego freedom to any in order to maintain or to promote trade with another is a dangerous scenario that will have inevitable secondary effects. 

So the alarm should be sounded across the West when a former British governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, as reported by Reuters this morning, claimed that Britain is not putting enough pressure on China to honor the promised democratic reforms it made in agreements on Hong Kong back in 1984. In the agreement, China has promised universal suffrage to Hong Kong, but recently, Beijing reneged on allowing the democratic reform in the 2017 elections for Hong Kong chief executive. China's preference has been to allow all the people to vote from a Beijing loyalist list vetted by the communism.

Speaking before a British inquiry by lawmakers into the state of democracy in Hong Kong, Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong before the 1997 takeover, told British lawmakers that: "There has always been quite a strong group in government and the business community which believes that you can only do business with China if you carefully avoid in all circumstances treading on China's toes or saying anything the Chinese disagree with," Reuters reported.

He added: "When China asserts that what is happening in Hong Kong is nothing to do with us, we should make it absolutely clear publicly and privately that that is not the case." He described China's claims as a "spit in the face" of the 1984 Joint Declaration on the conditions under which Hong Kong would be handed over. The former governor added that appeasing China's feelings "...encourages China to behave badly that we go on doing that." Governor Patten confirmed his belief that China's actions to deny universal suffrage to Hong Kong were in breach of the city's Basic Law. Furthermore, Governor Patten  pointed out,  according to the Reuters report, that "...the Joint Declaration provides obligations on China to us for 50 years...this is the Joint Declaration not the Chinese declaration."

In other words, Great Britain has a say on democratic reforms in Hong Kong, but Great Britain must bring the rights questions to bear upon China in respect to universal suffrage in the city.

Anything short of a clear declaration by Great Britain that the agreement it holds jointly on Hong Kong with China, calls for universal suffrage, would amount to a ransom of human rights and as fuel toward radicalization by some youth sensing another act of hippocracy by one of the stalwarts of democracy, freedom, equality and the rule of law.

[This Blog is republished on Asia Today]