RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

A Health Guideline Reversal and Questions - the Diminishing Authority of Health Experts Amid COVID-19
75-Years-Later - Another Defining Time Before the United Nations
No Escape from Crossing Fate - Trump's Inescapable Responsibility for the Spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Humanity - Today's Dilemma and Events and the Choices Toward a United Peaceful Tomorrow
A Forged Normalization - Flawed in the Absence of an Independent Palestine

Most Popular Posts

Mourn with Moore
On Partnerships of Conflicting Ideologies as a Force Shaping Extremism
DC Linktank
The World in 2014 - Asia
From This Point


Elections 2013
Friends in Business
Gun control
Immigration Reform
In America
Natural Disaster
The World
Towards 2014


September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013

powered by

My Blog

Ambiguous Hong Kong - a Product of Flawed Colonialism

That thousands of Hong Kongers remain in the streets of their island city financial hub in demonstration for greater democracy, is indicative of the history of Hong Kong and a flawed former colonial system. Great Britain,  having been the colonial master of Hong Kong, needs to explicitly convey to the People's Republic of China and to the people of Hong Kong, whether or not direct universal suffrage to Hong Kongers, is implied by the agreement that handed Hong Kong to China in 1997.

Moreover, the British need to determine and to make known whether or not China's decision on Hong Kong that would limit the number of candidates to run for the office of chief executive of the city, defines a breach of the undertakings China gave in the 1984 handover agreement. 

Barring an explicit British determination, Hong Kongers, who read from the agreement an opportunity for a greater degree of democracy, are now placed in an ambiguous position as to the definition of the laws that are being used to set Hong Kong's destiny. Can China continue to apply Beijing's interpretation as to the agreement that would let all the people vote for Beijing's limited candidates? Or does the international learned interpretation of the agreement mandate universal suffrage extending to an open candidate field and voting by all the electorate?

It is the international interpretation of the agreement that has hold out hope to the people of Hong Kong. It is the international reading of the agreement that has ignited the passion and the determination of the students and the pro-democracy activists of Hong Kong.

That Great Britain failed to explicitly offer independence to the people of Hong Kong in the 1984 agreement indicates a failure on the behalf of the colonial master to emancipate the former subjects of the empire. Great Britain delivered unto the communists in Beijing, a thriving metropolis of Hong Kong and its people with a high degree of and for freedom. Now, Great Britain could ameliorate the Hong Kong "cell phone and social-media  democracy movement" by concretely defining its agreed contract that spelled out greater autonomy for Hong Kong.