RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

No Escape from Crossing Fate - Trump's Inescapable Responsibility for the Spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.
Humanity - Today's Dilemma and Events and the Choices Toward a United Peaceful Tomorrow
A Forged Normalization - Flawed in the Absence of an Independent Palestine
"Apocalyptic" Conditions of Climate Change - the United States Western Wildfires
Unity Toward Defeating an Enemy - the Reality of 9.11.2001 in Contrast to COVID-19 2020

Most Popular Posts

Mourn with Moore
On Partnerships of Conflicting Ideologies as a Force Shaping Extremism
DC Linktank
The World in 2014 - Asia
From This Point


Elections 2013
Friends in Business
Gun control
Immigration Reform
In America
Natural Disaster
The World
Towards 2014


September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013

powered by

My Blog

After Sanctions, International Organization Reforms?

World development advances like the elasticity of a stretched rubber band - expansion, then the inevitable contraction. Why? For as trade and commerce expand necessitating the longings of nation states' desires for hard cash, the political and social order in placed to bind civility to the process, lags sadly behind the curve. I submit that trade and commerce advancements ahead of social and political affairs are recipes for conflict. Consider: Russia, having vast reserves of oil and gas and other sought after natural resources, has been able to continue sitting at the helm of many international organizations, despite dismal records of human rights and freedoms. So has China; for the international community has allowed this because of trade and cheap labor and despite the human rights issues. So when statements attributed to Russia's Putin, accusing the west of hippocratic standards are heard, it is not over Kosovo that he is referencing; it is the trade , the commerce and the memberships  into international organizations extended to him over the years. He is having a laugh of sorts. As he would reason : You buy my gas and my oil, yet you complain about my human rights record? If matters are that bad, why still buy from me? China is about to have a similar laugh: You are begging at my door for money and investments and you dare complain of my human rights record and policies? While other Russians might have worried about western sanctions over Crimea's annexation, Putin has remained as cool as a cucumber. He has suffice so much that western nations do not want to diminish their income possibilities, nor defer their thirsts, so any punishments will be token, much smaller than the actual prize. But the key to reining in rogues like Putin, and others to come,  lie in reforms at the United Nations(UN). In this dynamic time: An Age of Aspirations, A Time of Freedoms; how could China and Russia retain super veto status at the UN Security Council? On three occasions, these two nations, working as partners, have impeded western resolutions to end the bloody war in Syria. Russia recently vetoed a resolution against itself condemning the Crimea referendum vote; China abstained. If these two countries, which make up the retraction variable on the world's advancement elasticity cycle,  are allowed to sit on top of international organizations, then the world will continue to witness bleak downturns as actual progress teases within possible reach. Should the P5 status be retained at the Security Council, a possible reform could be a simple majority  for veto approval. Offered for your consideration and your discussion.