RSS Follow Become a Fan

Recent Posts

Voter Suppression 2020 - Defining American Democracy in the Term of Donald Trump
Deepest Sorrow to the Loved Ones of those Killed by COVID-19
Recklessness - the Trump Photo-Op and the Spread of COVID-19 at the White House
The Pandemic and the United States President - Crossing Fate
Stirring up Trouble Without the Capacity to Contain It - the Trump Division

Most Popular Posts

Mourn with Moore
On Partnerships of Conflicting Ideologies as a Force Shaping Extremism
DC Linktank
The World in 2014 - Asia
From This Point


Elections 2013
Friends in Business
Gun control
Immigration Reform
In America
Natural Disaster
The World
Towards 2014


October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013

powered by

My Blog

The UN, China, Russia and Rights Issues

Professors Abraham Yeselson and Anthony Gaglione in the book: A Dangerous Place: The United Nations As a Weapon in World Politics; Grossman, 1974, New York; argue that the UN is a weapon in international relations and should be recognized as such. If these learned professors are indeed true, then a larger problem emerges on examination of some of the actors on key seats of power at the UN, to wit: the P5 - China and Russia. I can attempt to say this diplomatically, but red, is always red despite the shade; thus, I opine that China and Russia present major stumbling blocks to the rights of humankind before the United Nations. How can two societies with major abuses and problems  involving the rights of humankind, wield any power over an International body chartered and entrusted to protect such rights? As our World becomes freer and more democratic, it is frightening to accept China and Russia as holders of  super veto status at the UN. As the World has evolved since 1945, so should the UN.  The continuation of the bloody war in Syria that has killed some 130,00 including 11,000 children, is testimony of the dangers of states with questionable human rights issues themselves, possessing a super veto in decisions involving human rights and international relations. China and Russia, on three occasions, blocked resolutions before the UN to force the Assad regime in Syria to end the war there. China and Russia used their P5 status to effect such tragic events. Blood continues to flow in the Levant today because the UN has not evolved to 2014 norms mandating democracy as a tenet and as a prerequisite to P5 status. The unabridged rights of humankind and the aspirations thereof to be free and to be respected with dignity, are the hallmarks of this millennium and the UN must secure these ideals by all means.